If you’re going to create a fuss about it, at least be fair to all
Not the economy, not the national security, not the course of national development – the reason for stalling the parliament these days is some statement made by a MP over Congress party.
Congress is the same party which destroyed the nation in its six decades of decay. People rejected this party because they felt Congress sold our national interests for a fortune in commissions, scams worth trillions, loss of national pride, separation in society and fostering anti national factions throughout the nation.
The adjective given by Sadhvi Jyoti is far far too less than what congress deserves. However, it was in a language that’s considered ‘unparliamentary’ in our McCauley bred society.
She should have rather used terms like ‘communal fascist dictator’
or ‘right wing Hindu racist bigot’ .
And is this the first time that a politician has used a so called ‘unparliamentary’ language ?
-Sonia said Modi is a merchant of death.
-Mayavati said “Tilak, Tarazu aur Talwar, Inko maaro jutey chaar” (slap the Brahmins, Kayasthas and Rajpoots with shoes)
-Azam Khan said “Bharat maata dayan hai”
-M Karunanidhi said “all hindus are theives”
The list is awfully long but you barely heard of them because none of them was wearing saffron clothes.
So the question is, again, why so choosy about it?